Coverart for item
The Resource Judicial Review in the Commonwealth Caribbean :

Judicial Review in the Commonwealth Caribbean :

Label
Judicial Review in the Commonwealth Caribbean :
Title
Judicial Review in the Commonwealth Caribbean :
Creator
Subject
Language
eng
Member of
Cataloging source
MiAaPQ
http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
Ramlogan, Rajendra
Dewey number
342.729066
LC call number
KGJ495 -- .R36 2007eb
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
dictionaries
Series statement
Commonwealth Caribbean Law
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • Courts -- Caribbean Area
  • Justice, Administration of -- Caribbean Area
Label
Judicial Review in the Commonwealth Caribbean :
Instantiates
Publication
Copyright
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
  • cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Color
multicolored
Content category
text
Content type code
  • txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Contents
  • Cover -- JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMONWEALTH CARIBBEAN -- Copyright -- CONTENTS -- LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS -- TABLE OF CASES -- TABLE OF LEGISLATION -- 1 JUDICIAL REVIEW: AN INTRODUCTION -- 1.1 WHAT IS JUDICIAL REVIEW? -- 1.2 PREROGATIVE ORDERS -- 1.3 COUNTRY PERSPECTIVES ON JUDICIAL REVIEW -- 1.3.1 Trinidad and Tobago -- 1.3.2 Barbados -- 1.3.3 Guyana -- 1.3.4 Jamaica -- 2 GROUNDS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW -- 2.1 UNREASONABLENESS OF THE DECISION -- 2.2 ERROR OF LAW -- 2.3 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANDATORY DIRECTIONS -- 2.4 MAKING OF POLICIES -- 2.5 THE DECISION-MAKER MUST MAKE AN INDEPENDENT DECISION -- 2.6 IMPROPER DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY -- 2.7 ABDICATION OF FUNCTIONS -- 2.8 FETTERING DISCRETION -- 2.9 BAD FAITH -- 2.10 FAILURE TO OBSERVE THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY -- 2.11 BREACH OF A LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION -- 2.12 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SETTLED PRACTICE -- 2.13 ACTING OUTSIDE OR IN EXCESS OF JURISDICTION -- 2.14 PROPORTIONALITY -- 2.15 TAKING INTO ACCOUNT IRRELEVANT CONSIDERATIONS -- 2.16 FAILURE TO CONSIDER RELEVANT MATTERS -- 2.17 DECISIONS MUST NOT BE TAINTED BY BIAS -- 2.18 ERRORS IN FORM OR PROCEDURE LACKING IN SUBSTANCE -- 2.19 FAILURE TO ASCERTAIN RELEVANT INFORMATION -- 2.20 PURSUING IMPROPER OBJECTIVES -- 2.21 UNREASONABLE DELAY -- 2.22 IMPROPER FINDINGS OF FACTS -- 2.23 WRONG ADHERENCE TO POLICY -- 2.24 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ADOPTED OR PUBLISHED PROCEDURES -- 2.25 RE-HEARING OF ISSUE -- 2.26 RIGHTS MUST BE CONSTRUED AS MEANINGFUL -- 3 NATURAL JUSTICE -- 3.1 OBSERVANCE OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE -- 3.1.1 Right to a Fair Hearing -- 3.1.2 Right to Full Particulars -- 3.1.3 Right to Consultation -- 3.1.4 Right To Respond/Make Representations -- 3.1.5 Duty Not to Make Decision Before Hearing -- 3.1.6 Right to Reasons -- 3.1.7 Right to Know of Investigation -- 3.1.8 Right to Participate Fully in Hearing
  • 3.1.9 Right to Know of Potential Adverse Findings -- 3.1.10 Right to Legal Representation -- 4 OBSTACLES TO A JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF THE MERITS OF A JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION -- 4.1 SUFFICIENT INTEREST -- 4.2 LEAVE GRANTED WHERE THERE IS AN ARGUABLE CASE -- 4.3 DELAY -- 4.4 MATERIAL DISCLOSURE -- 4.5 PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC FUNCTION -- 4.6 OUSTER OF JURISDICTION -- 4.7 MIXING OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND JUDICIAL REVIEW MATTERS -- 4.8 ALTERNATIVE PROCEEDINGS -- 4.9 REMEDY SOUGHT MUST BE MEANINGFUL -- 4.10 PREJUDICE TO THIRD PARTIES -- 4.11 GOOD ADMINISTRATION -- 4.12 GRANTING REVIEW OR SUBSTITUTING DECISION -- 4.13 WRONG PARTY -- 4.14 ADJOURNMENTS -- 4.15 NATURE OF DECISION -- 4.16 REVIEWING EXECUTIVE ACTIONS -- 4.17 REVIEWING JUDICIAL ACTIONS -- 4.18 REVIEWING PROSECUTORIAL AUTHORITY -- 4.19 REVOCATION OF LEAVE -- 4.20 PRESUMPTION OF REGULARITY -- 4.21 PREMATURE PROCEEDINGS -- 4.22 SPECIAL TRIBUNALS -- 4.23 RIGHT TO INTERVENE -- 4.24 JUDICIAL REVIEW AS FINAL PROCEEDINGS -- 5 CONDUCT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS -- 5.1 NEWSPAPER ARTICLES AS EVIDENCE -- 5.2 WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY -- 5.3 FRESH EVIDENCE AND EX POST FACTO REASONS -- 5.4 RAISING NEW GROUNDS -- 5.5 IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE -- 5.6 DISCOVERY -- 5.7 INTERROGATORIES -- 5.8 CROSS EXAMINATION -- 5.9 ANONYMOUS EVIDENCE -- 5.10 NATURE OF REPLY -- 5.11 RE-OPENING CASES -- 6 REMEDIES -- 6.1 MANDAMUS -- 6.2 DAMAGES -- 6.3 CERTIORARI -- 6.4 INJUNCTION -- 6.5 COSTS -- 7 BREAKING NEW GROUNDS -- 7.1 EQUALITY OF TREATMENT -- 7.2 SQUATTERS -- 7.3 POLITICAL PROCESS -- 7.4 THE ENVIRONMENT -- 7.5 CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE -- 7.6 RIGHT TO INFORMATION -- 8 CONCLUSION: JUSTICE IN THE FUTURE -- APPENDIX A: TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO -- The Judicial Review Act, No. 60 of 2000 -- Legal Notice No. 184: The Supreme Court of Judicature (Judicial Review) (Amendment) Rules, 2002 -- The Judicial Review (Amendment) Bill, 2005
  • APPENDIX B: JAMAICA -- Supreme Court of Jamaica Civil Procedure Rules 2002 -- APPENDIX C: BARBADOS -- Administrative Justice Act, No. 63 of 1980 -- The Judicial Review (Application) Rules, ([1983] S.I. 1983 No, 99) -- INDEX
Control code
UMKCLawddaEBC652981
Dimensions
unknown
Edition
1st ed.
Extent
1 online resource (343 pages)
Form of item
online
Isbn
9780203823927
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
  • c
Note
UMKC Law: DDA record.
Sound
unknown sound
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
  • (MiAaPQ)EBC652981
  • (Au-PeEL)EBL652981
  • (CaPaEBR)ebr10647689
  • (OCoLC)826487731
Label
Judicial Review in the Commonwealth Caribbean :
Publication
Copyright
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
  • cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Color
multicolored
Content category
text
Content type code
  • txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Contents
  • Cover -- JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE COMMONWEALTH CARIBBEAN -- Copyright -- CONTENTS -- LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS -- TABLE OF CASES -- TABLE OF LEGISLATION -- 1 JUDICIAL REVIEW: AN INTRODUCTION -- 1.1 WHAT IS JUDICIAL REVIEW? -- 1.2 PREROGATIVE ORDERS -- 1.3 COUNTRY PERSPECTIVES ON JUDICIAL REVIEW -- 1.3.1 Trinidad and Tobago -- 1.3.2 Barbados -- 1.3.3 Guyana -- 1.3.4 Jamaica -- 2 GROUNDS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW -- 2.1 UNREASONABLENESS OF THE DECISION -- 2.2 ERROR OF LAW -- 2.3 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANDATORY DIRECTIONS -- 2.4 MAKING OF POLICIES -- 2.5 THE DECISION-MAKER MUST MAKE AN INDEPENDENT DECISION -- 2.6 IMPROPER DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY -- 2.7 ABDICATION OF FUNCTIONS -- 2.8 FETTERING DISCRETION -- 2.9 BAD FAITH -- 2.10 FAILURE TO OBSERVE THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY -- 2.11 BREACH OF A LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION -- 2.12 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SETTLED PRACTICE -- 2.13 ACTING OUTSIDE OR IN EXCESS OF JURISDICTION -- 2.14 PROPORTIONALITY -- 2.15 TAKING INTO ACCOUNT IRRELEVANT CONSIDERATIONS -- 2.16 FAILURE TO CONSIDER RELEVANT MATTERS -- 2.17 DECISIONS MUST NOT BE TAINTED BY BIAS -- 2.18 ERRORS IN FORM OR PROCEDURE LACKING IN SUBSTANCE -- 2.19 FAILURE TO ASCERTAIN RELEVANT INFORMATION -- 2.20 PURSUING IMPROPER OBJECTIVES -- 2.21 UNREASONABLE DELAY -- 2.22 IMPROPER FINDINGS OF FACTS -- 2.23 WRONG ADHERENCE TO POLICY -- 2.24 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ADOPTED OR PUBLISHED PROCEDURES -- 2.25 RE-HEARING OF ISSUE -- 2.26 RIGHTS MUST BE CONSTRUED AS MEANINGFUL -- 3 NATURAL JUSTICE -- 3.1 OBSERVANCE OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE -- 3.1.1 Right to a Fair Hearing -- 3.1.2 Right to Full Particulars -- 3.1.3 Right to Consultation -- 3.1.4 Right To Respond/Make Representations -- 3.1.5 Duty Not to Make Decision Before Hearing -- 3.1.6 Right to Reasons -- 3.1.7 Right to Know of Investigation -- 3.1.8 Right to Participate Fully in Hearing
  • 3.1.9 Right to Know of Potential Adverse Findings -- 3.1.10 Right to Legal Representation -- 4 OBSTACLES TO A JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF THE MERITS OF A JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION -- 4.1 SUFFICIENT INTEREST -- 4.2 LEAVE GRANTED WHERE THERE IS AN ARGUABLE CASE -- 4.3 DELAY -- 4.4 MATERIAL DISCLOSURE -- 4.5 PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC FUNCTION -- 4.6 OUSTER OF JURISDICTION -- 4.7 MIXING OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND JUDICIAL REVIEW MATTERS -- 4.8 ALTERNATIVE PROCEEDINGS -- 4.9 REMEDY SOUGHT MUST BE MEANINGFUL -- 4.10 PREJUDICE TO THIRD PARTIES -- 4.11 GOOD ADMINISTRATION -- 4.12 GRANTING REVIEW OR SUBSTITUTING DECISION -- 4.13 WRONG PARTY -- 4.14 ADJOURNMENTS -- 4.15 NATURE OF DECISION -- 4.16 REVIEWING EXECUTIVE ACTIONS -- 4.17 REVIEWING JUDICIAL ACTIONS -- 4.18 REVIEWING PROSECUTORIAL AUTHORITY -- 4.19 REVOCATION OF LEAVE -- 4.20 PRESUMPTION OF REGULARITY -- 4.21 PREMATURE PROCEEDINGS -- 4.22 SPECIAL TRIBUNALS -- 4.23 RIGHT TO INTERVENE -- 4.24 JUDICIAL REVIEW AS FINAL PROCEEDINGS -- 5 CONDUCT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS -- 5.1 NEWSPAPER ARTICLES AS EVIDENCE -- 5.2 WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY -- 5.3 FRESH EVIDENCE AND EX POST FACTO REASONS -- 5.4 RAISING NEW GROUNDS -- 5.5 IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE -- 5.6 DISCOVERY -- 5.7 INTERROGATORIES -- 5.8 CROSS EXAMINATION -- 5.9 ANONYMOUS EVIDENCE -- 5.10 NATURE OF REPLY -- 5.11 RE-OPENING CASES -- 6 REMEDIES -- 6.1 MANDAMUS -- 6.2 DAMAGES -- 6.3 CERTIORARI -- 6.4 INJUNCTION -- 6.5 COSTS -- 7 BREAKING NEW GROUNDS -- 7.1 EQUALITY OF TREATMENT -- 7.2 SQUATTERS -- 7.3 POLITICAL PROCESS -- 7.4 THE ENVIRONMENT -- 7.5 CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE -- 7.6 RIGHT TO INFORMATION -- 8 CONCLUSION: JUSTICE IN THE FUTURE -- APPENDIX A: TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO -- The Judicial Review Act, No. 60 of 2000 -- Legal Notice No. 184: The Supreme Court of Judicature (Judicial Review) (Amendment) Rules, 2002 -- The Judicial Review (Amendment) Bill, 2005
  • APPENDIX B: JAMAICA -- Supreme Court of Jamaica Civil Procedure Rules 2002 -- APPENDIX C: BARBADOS -- Administrative Justice Act, No. 63 of 1980 -- The Judicial Review (Application) Rules, ([1983] S.I. 1983 No, 99) -- INDEX
Control code
UMKCLawddaEBC652981
Dimensions
unknown
Edition
1st ed.
Extent
1 online resource (343 pages)
Form of item
online
Isbn
9780203823927
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
  • c
Note
UMKC Law: DDA record.
Sound
unknown sound
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
  • (MiAaPQ)EBC652981
  • (Au-PeEL)EBL652981
  • (CaPaEBR)ebr10647689
  • (OCoLC)826487731

Library Locations

    • Leon E. Bloch Law LibraryBorrow it
      500 E. 52nd Street, Kansas City, MO, 64110, US
      39.032488 -94.581967
Processing Feedback ...