The Resource "Can I get a second opinion?" : How user characteristics impact trust in automation in a medical screening task, by Norah Celeste Hass

"Can I get a second opinion?" : How user characteristics impact trust in automation in a medical screening task, by Norah Celeste Hass

Label
"Can I get a second opinion?" : How user characteristics impact trust in automation in a medical screening task
Title
"Can I get a second opinion?"
Title remainder
How user characteristics impact trust in automation in a medical screening task
Statement of responsibility
by Norah Celeste Hass
Title variation
How user characteristics impact trust in automation in a medical screening task
Creator
Contributor
Author
Degree supervisor
Subject
Genre
Language
eng
Summary
As technology advances, processes traditionally carried out by humans are being automated in a variety of industries, such as automotive, security, and food service. In the medical field, advances in automation allow for disease classification, diagnosis, and even treatment recommendations. Technological advances have improved diagnoses by automated devices such that many cases can be more accurately diagnosed by a computer program than by a medical doctor. The hindrance to implementing these technologies is that these systems need not only to exist, they must be accepted, trusted, and appropriately used by both patients and healthcare providers. Previous literature on automation acceptance has focused primarily on how design features and characteristics of the automation influence human trust. Less research has explored the role that user characteristics--such as personality and dispositional traits--play in developing trust. User responses to automation may warrant adaptation in how automation is presented and distributed in order to encourage its acceptance. In the present study, researchers examined the relationship between user characteristics, trust, and automation use in a medical screening decision task. Although user characteristics were found to predict trust attitudes, they did not significantly predict trust behaviors, i.e., automation use. These findings are discussed with the consideration of the differences between attitudes and behaviors in predicting trust. Keywords: trust in automation, medical decision-making, trust, automation, user traits
Cataloging source
UMK
http://library.link/vocab/creatorDate
1990-
http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
Hass, Norah Celeste
Degree
Ph.D.
Dissertation note
(Department of Psychology).
Dissertation year
2019.
Granting institution
University of Missouri-Kansas City,
Illustrations
illustrations
Index
no index present
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
  • dictionaries
  • bibliography
  • theses
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
Lim, Seung-Lark
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • Medicine
  • Medical screening
  • Patients
  • Medical personnel
Label
"Can I get a second opinion?" : How user characteristics impact trust in automation in a medical screening task, by Norah Celeste Hass
Instantiates
Publication
Copyright
Note
  • "A dissertation in Psychology."
  • Advisor: Seung-Lark Lim
  • Vita
Antecedent source
not applicable
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 168-184)
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
  • cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Color
black and white
Content category
text
Content type code
  • txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Contents
Introduction -- Review of literature -- Methods -- Appendix A. Checklist for trust between people and automation -- Appendix B. Propensity to trust questionnaire -- Appendix C. Automation-induced complacency potential rating scale -- Appendix D. Rotter's Interpersonal trust Scale -- Appendix E. Big Five inventory -- Appendix F. revised domain-specific risk-taking (Dospert) scale -- Appendix G. Desirability of control scale -- Appendix H. Levenson IPC Scale -- Appendix I. General self-efficacy scale -- Appendix J. Demographics -- Appendix K. Media and technology usage and attitudes scale -- Appendix L. Multidimensional health locus of control scale -- Appendix M. Pre- and post-task questions
Control code
1120770687
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
1 online resource (185 pages)
File format
one file format
Form of item
online
Level of compression
mixed
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
  • c
Other physical details
illustrations.
Quality assurance targets
not applicable
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
(OCoLC)1120770687
System details
  • The full text of the dissertation is available as an Adobe Acrobat .pdf file; Adobe Acrobat Reader required to view the file
  • Mode of access: World Wide Web
Label
"Can I get a second opinion?" : How user characteristics impact trust in automation in a medical screening task, by Norah Celeste Hass
Publication
Copyright
Note
  • "A dissertation in Psychology."
  • Advisor: Seung-Lark Lim
  • Vita
Antecedent source
not applicable
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 168-184)
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
  • cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Color
black and white
Content category
text
Content type code
  • txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Contents
Introduction -- Review of literature -- Methods -- Appendix A. Checklist for trust between people and automation -- Appendix B. Propensity to trust questionnaire -- Appendix C. Automation-induced complacency potential rating scale -- Appendix D. Rotter's Interpersonal trust Scale -- Appendix E. Big Five inventory -- Appendix F. revised domain-specific risk-taking (Dospert) scale -- Appendix G. Desirability of control scale -- Appendix H. Levenson IPC Scale -- Appendix I. General self-efficacy scale -- Appendix J. Demographics -- Appendix K. Media and technology usage and attitudes scale -- Appendix L. Multidimensional health locus of control scale -- Appendix M. Pre- and post-task questions
Control code
1120770687
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
1 online resource (185 pages)
File format
one file format
Form of item
online
Level of compression
mixed
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
  • c
Other physical details
illustrations.
Quality assurance targets
not applicable
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
(OCoLC)1120770687
System details
  • The full text of the dissertation is available as an Adobe Acrobat .pdf file; Adobe Acrobat Reader required to view the file
  • Mode of access: World Wide Web

Library Locations

  • Health Sciences LibraryBorrow it
    2411 Holmes St, Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, 64108, US
    39.083418 -94.575323
  • LaBudde Special CollectionsBorrow it
    800 E 51st St, Kansas City, MO, 64110, US
    39.034642 -94.576835
  • Leon E. Bloch Law LibraryBorrow it
    500 E. 52nd Street, Kansas City, MO, 64110, US
    39.032488 -94.581967
  • Marr Sound ArchivesBorrow it
    800 E 51st St, Kansas City, MO, 64110, US
    39.034642 -94.576835
  • Miller Nichols LibraryBorrow it
    800 E 51st St, Kansas City, MO, 64110, US
    39.035061 -94.576518
  • UMKCBorrow it
    800 E 51st St, Kansas City, MO, 64110, US
    39.035061 -94.576518
  • UMKCBorrow it
    800 E 51st St, Kansas City, MO, 64110, US
Processing Feedback ...