Coverart for item
The Resource A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856, By Benjamin C. Howard

A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856, By Benjamin C. Howard

Label
A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856
Title
A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856
Statement of responsibility
By Benjamin C. Howard
Creator
Contributor
Subject
Language
eng
Member of
Cataloging source
ZSL
Index
no index present
Literary form
non fiction
http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/organizationName
United States
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorDate
  • 1809-1858
  • 1806 or 1807-1857
  • 1791-1872
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
  • Scott, Dred
  • Sanford, John F. A.
  • Howard, Benjamin C.
Series statement
Notable Trials Library
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • Scott, Dred
  • African Americans
  • Citizenship
  • Missouri compromise
Label
A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856, By Benjamin C. Howard
Instantiates
Publication
Note
  • Reprint. [from the Reports of the U.S. Supreme Court] --New York:D. Appleton & Co., 1857
  • "This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Missouri. It was an action of trespass vi et armis instituted in the Circuit court by Scott against Sandford."--p. 396
  • The points brought into question in the Supreme Court were Negro citizenship and the jurisdiction of the Circuit court. The constitutionality of the Missouri compromise act was also considered
Carrier category
volume
Carrier category code
  • nc
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Content category
text
Content type code
  • txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Control code
32406901
Dimensions
23 cm
Extent
pages [393]-633
Lccn
lum95031614
Media category
unmediated
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
  • n
System control number
(WaOLN)1653236
Label
A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856, By Benjamin C. Howard
Publication
Note
  • Reprint. [from the Reports of the U.S. Supreme Court] --New York:D. Appleton & Co., 1857
  • "This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Missouri. It was an action of trespass vi et armis instituted in the Circuit court by Scott against Sandford."--p. 396
  • The points brought into question in the Supreme Court were Negro citizenship and the jurisdiction of the Circuit court. The constitutionality of the Missouri compromise act was also considered
Carrier category
volume
Carrier category code
  • nc
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Content category
text
Content type code
  • txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Control code
32406901
Dimensions
23 cm
Extent
pages [393]-633
Lccn
lum95031614
Media category
unmediated
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
  • n
System control number
(WaOLN)1653236

Library Locations

    • Leon E. Bloch Law LibraryBorrow it
      500 E. 52nd Street, Kansas City, MO, 64110, US
      39.032488 -94.581967
Processing Feedback ...